Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan take a stand against deepfake misuse—filing a Rs 4 crore lawsuit
Image Source: MoneyControl
Bollywood icons Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan have drawn a firm line in the digital sand. On September 6, the couple filed a Rs 4 crore lawsuit against YouTube and its parent company Google. They called out the platform for hosting AI-generated deepfake videos that twist their likeness into sexually explicit and fabricated scenarios. These aren’t just misleading clips—they’re violations of identity, dignity, and consent. The petition doesn’t just demand takedowns—it asks for a injunction against the misuse of their image and voice. This comes especially in an era where AI can replicate faces with chilling accuracy. What’s more, the couple has raised red flags about YouTube’s policy that lets creators opt-in for AI training. A rule that could use manipulated content to train future algorithms.
As the Delhi High Court gears up for a January hearing. The case has sparked urgent conversations around digital ethics and celebrity privacy. It also highlights India’s glaring need for clear AI regulation. This isn’t just a legal battle—it’s a wake-up call.
The Lawsuit: A Fight for Digital Dignity
In a landmark move, Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan have taken legal action against YouTube and Google. They filed a Rs 4 crore lawsuit that underscores the growing threat of deepfake content in India’s entertainment landscape. The petition, lodged in the Delhi High Court, isn’t just about financial damages. It’s a demand for accountability in a digital age where AI can distort reality with alarming ease. The couple flagged over 259 manipulated videos from a channel named AI Bollywood Ishq, which has racked up more than 16.5 million views. These videos include fabricated scenes—like Aishwarya Rai in a pool with Salman Khan, and Abhishek Bachchan reacting to doctored footage of his wife—designed to provoke, mislead, and sensationalize.
What makes this case especially urgent is the fear that companies could use such content to train future AI models, embedding false narratives into algorithms that replicate and amplify them.
The Deepfake Dilemma
This isn’t just about one viral video—it’s about the unsettling truth of how fast fiction can become fact online. At the heart of the Bachchans’ lawsuit is a growing fear: that AI-generated deepfakes aren’t just creepy or crude—they’re capable of rewriting someone’s identity in real time. These aren’t harmless spoofs. They’re digital impersonations that distort faces, voices, and emotions into something unrecognizable, yet eerily believable.
The couple’s legal team has flagged a loophole in YouTube’s policy that feels almost dystopian. Creators can opt-in to let their content train AI models—even if that content is manipulated or defamatory. So once a deepfake is uploaded, it doesn’t just sit there—AI systems absorb, replicate, and potentially use it to teach future algorithms how to mimic more convincingly. It’s like feeding lies into a machine that’s designed to make them look real.
In India, where personality rights are still legally fuzzy, this kind of misuse hits harder. Public figures have little recourse when malicious actors hijack their digital selves. The Bachchans aren’t just asking for takedowns—they’re asking for a system that stops fiction from becoming a permanent part of someone’s online identity. Because in a world where AI can fake intimacy, outrage, and even love, the real danger isn’t the video—it’s the echo.
AI Training and the Ethics of Consent
The Bachchans’ lawsuit doesn’t just call out deepfake videos—it questions the very system that allows them to evolve unchecked. At the heart of their petition is a simple but powerful concern: once a video—real or fake—is uploaded and viewed, it doesn’t just vanish. It can be scraped, recycled, and fed into AI models that learn from it, replicate it, and push it further into the digital bloodstream.
That’s where things get murky. YouTube’s current policy lets creators opt-in for AI training, but what happens when the content isn’t theirs to begin with? What if it’s a manipulated clip, a misrepresentation, or worse—something sexually explicit involving someone who never gave consent? The Bachchans are asking the court to step in, to draw a boundary between innovation and exploitation.
India’s Legal Vacuum on Personality Rights
In India, the idea that someone should have control over their own image, voice, and likeness still floats in legal limbo. Unlike the U.S., where well-defined personality rights protect celebrities, Indian law often leaves public figures unprotected when malicious actors misuse their identities—especially in the wild west of AI-generated content. There’s no clear law that says,“This face, this voice, this digital version of me—you can’t use it without permission.” And that silence has left the door wide open for deepfakes to thrive.
That’s what makes the Bachchans’ lawsuit feel like more than just a legal move—it’s a cultural moment. By calling out YouTube and Google, they’re not just defending their own dignity; they’re asking India to catch up. To draw a line. To say that even in a world of algorithms and avatars, real people deserve real protection.
As deepfakes get sharper and harder to spot, the urgency grows. This case could be the spark that finally pushes India to reckon with digital identity, consent, and the messy, very human question of who gets to own your face in a synthetic world.
Stay updated with the latest news on The World Times. Get all the trending City News, India News, Business News, and Sports News.
